E-LIBRARY / OTHER PUBLICATIONS / Topics / 929.htm
M. De Pietri, 2018-.
.

Topics


Intro
Alphabetical list of authors
Topic list


Intro

     This page aims at collecting the main entries related to some specific and relevant “Topics” discussed in the present e-Library [the reader will find useful references to these topics also under page Topical index].
     The present page displays the main topics, offering entries with titles and brief abstracts; the entries are organized in a chronological order; at the top page, an alphabetical list of authors is included, allowing a quick search also for authors' names.


Alphabetical list of authors

     This list displays in alphabetical order the authors of the contributions mentioned in the following Topic list (each number link to a singular contribution).

A    B    C    D    E    F    G    H    I    J    K    L    M    N    O    P    Q    R    S    T    U    V    W    X    Y    Z

A
Agnew, Neville: 1; 2; 3

B
Barozzi, Marta: 1
Bonetti, Sophie: 1
Bridgland, Janet: 1
Buccellati, Federico: 1
Buccellati, Giorgio: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11

D
Dell'Unto, Nicoló: 1
Demas, Martha: 1; 2

F
Forte, Maurizio: 1

K
Kelly-Buccellati, Marilyn: 1; 2; 3; 4

S
Stanley Price, Nicholas: 1

V
Viscuso, Salvatore: 1

Z
Zanelli, Alessandra: 1

  Back to top

Topic list

     This list displays in alphabetical order the main “Topics” [cf. also the list on the left menu]; under each topic, entries are organized in chronological order (from the older to the more recent contributions). At the beginning, a list of “Topics” is offered, directly linking to the related entries.

A    B    C    D    E    F    G    H    I    J    K    L    M    N    O    P    Q    R    S    T    U    V    W    X    Y    Z   

C
Ceramics
Conservation

S
Seals

  Back to top

Ceramics



  Back to top

Conservation



Stanley Price, Nicholas
1995
“Excavation and Conservation,”
in N. Stanley Price (ed.), Conservation on Archeological Excavations,
Rome: ICCROM, pp. 1-9.
See full text
See full volume
     A programmatic document for both “immovable” and movable items.
[gB – December 2005]

  Back to top
UMS 3
1998
Buccellati, Giorgio and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati (eds)
Urkesh and the Hurrians.

A volume in Honor of Lloyd Cotsen.

Bibliotheca Mesopotamica 26.
Malibu: Undena Publications, 1998.
PDF
     The series Urkesh/Mozan Studies. continues directly the earlier series which was simply entitled Mozan and which has been discontinued (hence there are no volumes 1 and 2 in the UMS series). An accompanying slide set and a CD which duplicates exactly the volume and the slides is also available.
      Dedicated to Lloyd Cotsen, a well-known Aegean archaeologist and a long time friend and supporter of the Expedition, the volume opens with a presentation to the honoree and a biographical sketch by Ernestine S. Elster.
     The first four chapters, by staff members, deal with new aspects of the excavations at Mozan/Urkesh, while the others, by distinguished colleagues from Europe and the United States, place the site in its wider historical perspective.

Table of contents
Giorgio Buccellati: Preface
1. Ernestine S. Elster: Lloyd Cotsen: A Brief Archaeological Biography
2. Giorgio Buccellati: Urkesh as Tell Mozan: Profiles of the Ancient City
3. Marilyn Kelly–Buccellati: The Workshops at Urkesh
4. Federico Buccellati: 3–D Rendering and Animation at Tell Mozan/Urkesh
5. Rick Hauser: The Equids of Urkesh: What the Figurines Say
6. Piotr Steinkeller: The Historical Background of Urkesh and the Hurrian Beginnings in Northern Mesopotamia
7. Mirjo Salvini: The Earliest Evidence of the Hurrians Before the Formation of the Reign of Mittani
8. Gernot Wilhelm: Die Inschrift des Tišatal von Urkeš
9. Vyacheslav Vs. Ivanov: Horse Symbols and the name of the Horse in Hurrian
10. Harry A. Hoffner, Jr.: Hurrian Civilization from a Hittite Perspective
[mDP – June 2020]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio
2000
“Urkesh: archeologia, conservazione e restauro,”
Kermes 13, pp. 41-48.
See full text
See abstract
     Restoration techniques newly developed at Tell Mozan for the conservation of ancient buildings are here presented and discussed, underlining the usefulness of this system both for scholars studying the site and for visitors or tourists visiting its ancient remains.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati
2000
“The Royal Palace of Urkesh. Report on the 12th Season at Tell Mozan/Urkesh: Excavations in Area AA, June-October 1999,”
Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft zu Berlin 132, pp. 133-183.
See full text
See abstract
     Area AA (the Royal Palace) at Urkesh has been further investigated in the 12th season, in 1999; the results of this archaeological campaign are reported herewith: the finding on sealings of the name of Tar’am-Agade (Naram-Sin's daughter); the investigations in Area C2 with the discovery of a sealings cache; the interpretation of an iwan structure as a possible scribal installation; the description of some structures on the exterior of the palace; the excavation in the residential quarters of the time of the 'Bitumen Use Ceramic Tradition'; a clay statuette of a female figure is introduced; a paragraph is devoted to the description of the main ceramic typologies; eventually, computer network and digital photography, together with conservation strategies are presented.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio and Sophie Bonetti
2003
“Conservation at the Core of Archaeological Strategy: The Case of Ancient Urkesh at Tell Mozan,”
Conservation, The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter 18, pp. 18-21.
See full text
Alternative online version
See abstract
     A new concept of 'conservation' is presented in this paper, describing innovative conservation technique adopted at Tell Mozan. To fulfil this goal, a strict relationship and collaboration between archaeologists, restorers and conservation is developed.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Agnew, Neville and Martha Demas
2004
“Monitoring through Replication. Design and Evaluation of the Monitoring Reburial at the Laetoli Trackway Site,”
Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, pp. 295-304.
See full text
See abstract
      This contribution aims to answer to a basic methodological question: “How is it possible to monitor the condition of a site or artefact after it has been reburied?” (p. 295).
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Federico, Nicoló Dell'Unto, and Maurizio Forte
2005
“The Tell Mozan/Urkesh Archaeological Project: an Integrated Approach of Spatial Technologies,”
in Maurizio Forte (ed.),
The Reconstruction of Archaeological Landscapes through Digital Technologies, Oxford: BAR International, pp. 171-183.
See full text
See abstract
     Archeological structures and remains in general can be currently investigated thanks to modern technologies leading to a better analysis and recording of the data (within the concept of a 'Browser Edition') and to a more effective strategy of conservation. The most important techniques of topographical relief are deeply presented in this paper, offering an overview on some practical applications at Tell Mozan.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati
2005
“Urkesh as a Hurrian Religious Center,”
Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 47, pp. 27-59.
See full text
See abstract
     Report of the 17th excavation season (2004) at Tell Mozan: the peculiar, historical role of Urkesh as a Hurrian religious center is stressed; the present excavation season aimed at better investigating and clarifing the ethnic valence of Urkesh's sacral and political spaces: the Temple Terrace (together with the ābi) and the Royal Palace.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Agnew, Neville and Janet Bridgland
2006
Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation.
Proceedings of the Conservation Theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003.
Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
See full text
See abstract
      These proceedings deal with many topics about conservation, considered as “a core value for most archaeological societies. It is highlighted in their codes of ethics, statements of mission, and governance. In recognition of this, the World Archaeological Congress, with the Getty Conservation Institute and a consortium of other conservation organizations, brought together scholars working throughout the globe to discuss vital issues that affect archaeological heritage today”.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio
2006a
“Conservation qua Archaeology at Tell Mozan/Urkesh,”
in N. Agnew and J. Bridgland (eds.), Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation, Proceedings of the Conservation Theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington D.C. 22-26 June 2003, Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, pp. 73-81.
See full text
See abstract
     The destructive nature of the archaeological work needs for the development of proper registration of data and the following conservation of the uncovered structures. The innovative conservation system firstly applied at Urkesh is here deeply described, stressing the benefits of this new setup od the archaeological site, perceived as an archaeological park as a whole.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio
2006b
“Presentation and Interpretation of Archaeological Sites: the Case of Tell Mozan, Ancient Urkesh,”
in N. Agnew and J. Bridgland (eds.), Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation, Proceedings of the Conservation Theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington D.C. 22-26 June 2003, Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, pp. 152-156.
See full text
See abstract
     After the proper excavation process, archaeologists are required to act towards two goals: the interpretation and preservation of the excavated structures and material and the presentation of the site to the wider public of scholars and tourists. The different strategies of preservation and presentation of Tell Mozan are here briefly outlined.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio
2010
“The Urkesh Temple Terrace: Function and Perception,”
in J. Becker, R. Hempelmann, and E. Rehm (eds.), Kulturlandschaft Syrien - Zentrum und Peripherie - Festschrift für Jan-Waalke Meyer, AOAT 371, Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, pp. 87-121.
See full text
See abstract
     The structure and the function of Urkesh's Temple Terrace is widely analysed in the present contribution, aiming to define the limits and features of ancient perception on this monumental structures.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio
2014a
“Konservierung der archäologischen Stätte,”
Antike Welt. Zeitschrift für Archäologie und Kulturgeschichte [online journal].
See full text
Alternative online version
See abstract
     The interpretation and presentation of the archaeological site of Urkesh are here discussed from the very beginning of the discovery to the current strategies of conservation and valorization, underlining the innovation of the browser edition of archaeological data and the innovative preservation system for architectural remains.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio
2014b
“Courage among the Ruins: A Sustainable Conservation Program in Time of War,”
Backdirt, December, pp. 102-112.
See full text
See abstract
     This paper aims in defining how archaeologists' responsability involves also (and probably mostly) the inclusion and valorization of the local community living nearby the ancient site of Urkesh; moreover, the current war-situation in Syria needs for new strategies of courage and braveness to maintaining the contacts with the local community of Tell Mozan, towards an increasing sense of involvement and mutual responsability.
[mDP – November 2019]

  Back to top
Buccellati, Giorgio and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati
2017
“Conserviamo il futuro,”
in Tracce, febbraio 2017, pp. 36-39.
See full text
     A discussion about preservation and conservation of archaeological sites in Syria during wartime, aiming at describing different efforts of local archaeologists (and common people, too) to defend the archaeological heritage of ancient Syria.
[mDP – January 2020]

  Back to top
Viscuso, Salvatore, Alessandra Zanelli and Marta Barozzi
2018
“Textiles and Archaeological Sites: Towards a Methodology for Designing Lightweight Protective Structures,”
in S. Di Salvo, (ed.), Adaptive Materials Research for Architecture, (Advanced Materials Research 1149), Zurich: Scientific.Net, 2018, pp. 109-118.
See full text [DOI]
See abstract
     The paper discusses about the development of the best-fitting shelters used to cover (temporally or for long-time) archaeological sites, taking in consideration three main goals: 1) the protection of the archaeological structures; 2) a support to the archaeologist during their field word; 3) a complete and well achievable fruition of the archaeological remains to the visitors.
[mDP – July 2019]

  Back to top
Agnew, Neville and Martha Demas
2019
“Integrating Conservation, Archaeology, and Community at Tell Mozan (Urkesh),”
in Stefano Valentini and Guido Guarducci (eds.), Between Syria and the Highlands. Studies in Honor of Giorgio Buccellati and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati, CAMNES: Studies on the Ancient Near East and the Mediterranean, Volume 3,
Roma: Arbor Sapientiae, pp. 15-20.
See full text
     “The conservation model for archaeology that emerged in the 1970s as a response to loss of sites was a seminal development in the practice of archaeology. In the present era of challenges, the integration of conservation, archaeology and community at Tell Mozan exemplifies a compelling evolution of the model for excavated sites” (authors' abstract on p. 15).
[mDP – January 2020]

  Back to top

Seals



  Back to top