Back to top: 1. Emplacement
Concepts
Emplacement refers to the way things are in the ground. In particular, it aims to observe, document and describe (1) the individual elements in terms of the nature and internal disposition of their inner components (e.g., alignment of inclusions) and (2) their reciprocal localization in terms of the different types of direct contact. The description of the elements looks at emplacement statically, i.e., in the way each element is constituted and configured internally. The description of their reciprocal localization looks at the elements dynamically, i.e., in the way in which they interact one (the subject) with the other (the object).
The term “emplacement” is not current in the literature, nor are some of the categories I use to define the elements and their interrelationship. I will introduce here the major ones as they will be applied to the discussion of the specific data from the current book.
Back to top: 1. Emplacement
Elements
The defining criterion is the manner of alignment of the components, i.e., the manner in which the constitutive structure of the element, as seen in place, appears to us. On this basis we can distinguish the following major types (for the typological definition see under typology):
| category | criterion: manner of alignment | example (typological definition) |
| 1. horizontal surface | compaction or juxtaposition along a single plane | earthen floor, pavement, etc. |
| 2. layering or gradual build-up |
horizontal alignment of inclusions within an inert matrix, and with inclusions generally having a horizontal angle of repose | lens, accumulation, etc. |
| 3. amorphous amassmment | random alignment of inclusions | fill, brickfall, etc. |
| 4. ordered aggregation | patterned organization of components, along a horizontal and a vertical axis | wall, oven, etc. |
Back to top: 1. Emplacement
Types of contact
The different ways in which elements may occur in their spatial interrelationship are described by a specific and limited set of depositional verbs. The situations defined by these verbs determine the relative temporal sequencing within the stratigraphic context. At this stage, attentino is focused on the emplacement proper, i.e., on how the elements are in cnotact with each other in the ground.
Back to top: 1. Emplacement
Data presentation in the UGR
In our recording, emphasis is given to the most generic definition for any given feature. This is the category that will be found in the overview given for each excavation unit in the synthetic portion of the UGR page under emplacement. Under each of the four categories listed above, one will find the major types of element, given ccording to their typological definition.
Back to top: 1. Emplacement
Relevance for documentation
The main reason why it is crucial that the distinction be closely maintained is that only emplacement can be properly observed and documented, while deposition can only be inferred (and hence cannot be documented). Since documentation is the main task of proper field work, it will be clear why the two must be kept rigorously distinct, even though it is impossible to deal with one without dealing at the same time with the other. In other words, it is not a matter of being blind to either one or the other, but rather to keep the levels of analysis separate, all the while invoking both at one and the same time.
Back to top: 1. Emplacement